In a head to head comparison the 860 looses by a very modest 6% in terms of effective speed. The 860 evo demonstrates marginally reduced performance compared to its popular, but now three year old predecessor, the 850 evo.
Samsung 860 Evo Vs 850 Evo. In a head to head comparison the 860 looses by a very modest 6% in terms of effective speed. The 860 evo demonstrates marginally reduced performance compared to its popular, but now three year old predecessor, the 850 evo.
The 860 evo demonstrates marginally reduced performance compared to its popular, but now three year old predecessor, the 850 evo. In a head to head comparison the 860 looses by a very modest 6% in terms of effective speed.
The 860 evo demonstrates marginally reduced performance compared to its popular, but now three year old predecessor, the 850 evo.
The 860 evo demonstrates marginally reduced performance compared to its popular, but now three year old predecessor, the 850 evo. In a head to head comparison the 860 looses by a very modest 6% in terms of effective speed. The 860 evo demonstrates marginally reduced performance compared to its popular, but now three year old predecessor, the 850 evo.
In a head to head comparison the 860 looses by a very modest 6% in terms of effective speed. In a head to head comparison the 860 looses by a very modest 6% in terms of effective speed. The 860 evo demonstrates marginally reduced performance compared to its popular, but now three year old predecessor, the 850 evo.
In a head to head comparison the 860 looses by a very modest 6% in terms of effective speed.
The 860 evo demonstrates marginally reduced performance compared to its popular, but now three year old predecessor, the 850 evo. The 860 evo demonstrates marginally reduced performance compared to its popular, but now three year old predecessor, the 850 evo. In a head to head comparison the 860 looses by a very modest 6% in terms of effective speed.
The 860 evo demonstrates marginally reduced performance compared to its popular, but now three year old predecessor, the 850 evo.
In a head to head comparison the 860 looses by a very modest 6% in terms of effective speed. In a head to head comparison the 860 looses by a very modest 6% in terms of effective speed. The 860 evo demonstrates marginally reduced performance compared to its popular, but now three year old predecessor, the 850 evo.
The 860 evo demonstrates marginally reduced performance compared to its popular, but now three year old predecessor, the 850 evo.
The 860 evo demonstrates marginally reduced performance compared to its popular, but now three year old predecessor, the 850 evo. The 860 evo demonstrates marginally reduced performance compared to its popular, but now three year old predecessor, the 850 evo. In a head to head comparison the 860 looses by a very modest 6% in terms of effective speed.
In a head to head comparison the 860 looses by a very modest 6% in terms of effective speed. In a head to head comparison the 860 looses by a very modest 6% in terms of effective speed. The 860 evo demonstrates marginally reduced performance compared to its popular, but now three year old predecessor, the 850 evo.